STUDI KOMPARATIF TAHAPAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN PERDESAAN DI INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA

Studi Kasus: Desa Alamendah, Kabupaten Bandung-Indonesia dan Desa Peruas, Pahang-Malaysia

Authors

  • AHLUNNAZA PANDU RAHARJO
  • NIA KURNIASARI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29313/jpwk.v14i2.278

Keywords:

Planning Process, Rural Planning, Policy Of Rural Development Planning

Abstract

The growth of urban areas very rapidly raises significant issues that take effect in the development of rural areas. The strategic issues of rural development in Indonesia and Malaysia are poverty, unemployment, and economic vulnerability of rural communities; limited availability of public services and the minimum basic service, low empowerment of rural communities, not optimal village governance and institutional role of the village in the planning and development of the village, not optimal spatial arrangement of rural areas, natural resource management and environmental environment, the limited availability of infrastructure in the open isolation of rural areas and encourage linkages Rural- Urban. This study is intended to determine how the rural development planning process in Indonesia dan Malaysia. This study used qualitative research methods with a qualitative descriptive design format to describe the condition of the various phenomena that exist in the community that the object of research, and pull it to the surface of reality as a feature, character, nature, model or description of the condition or phenomenon particular. Data was collected through structured and in-depth interviews, and studies in the literature that focused on the exploration of related literature. Data analysis is done by using the method of triangulation and interpretative. Triangulation method rests on the validity of the findings and the level of confidence. Data analysis is inductive, meaning is the result of research rather than generalizations. Stages of Rural Development Planning in Indonesia and Malaysia are basically not much different, the two countries each have the characteristics and traits of its own in the formulation of rural development planning in the country. Based on the Minister Regulation Number 114 of 2014 on Guidelines for Rural Development, Indonesia defines the planning of rural development in the form of Mid Term Development Plan Rural (Rural Development Plan). Malaysia defines the rural development plan according to Act 172 About Design City and Village act 1976 in the form Slowly Rural (PTD). The results of this research can be used as a model for the analysis of policy makers both at the central and regional governments.

References

Arsyad, Lincolin. 1994. Analisis Potensi Ekonomi Daerah, Program Pemses, Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Awang, S.A., 1999. “Pengembangan Hutan Rakyat di Jawa Tengah : Harapan dan Tantangan.” Dalam Jurnal Hutan Rakyat. Vol. 1 No. 1 November 1999. Penerbit Pusat Kajian Hutan Rakyat Jurusan Manajemen Fakultas Kehutanan UGM, Yogyakarta
Bratakusumah, Deddy Supriady & Riyadi. 2004. Perencanaan Pembangunan.Daerah. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Chadwick, Bruce A, 1991, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial, (terjemahan), Sulistia ML., Semarang: IKIP Press
Conyers, Diana. 1991. Perencanaan Sosial di Dunia Ketiga. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Daryanto, A dan N. Nuryartono. 2007. Penguatan Ketahanan Masyarakat Desa (Community Resilience) dalam Pembangunan Sosial Ekonomi Desa. Paper dipresentasikan pada Seminar Desa Mandiri Menuju 2030. Mei 2007. Bogor.
Dermawan, Rizky. 2004. Pengambilan Keputusan, Landasan Filosofis, Konsep, dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta
Esman, J, Milton and Norman I Uphoff. 1984. Local Organizations. Ithaca And London: Cornel University Press
Esterberg, Kristin G. 2002. Qualitative Methods in Social Research. New York: McGrow Hill.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: AnInquiry into a category of Bbourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity.
Harahap, Sofyan Safri. 1999. Sistem Pengawasan Manajemen (Management Control System). Jakarta : Quantum.
Hasan, Zubair. 2006. “Sustainable Development from an Islamic Perspective: Meaning, Implications, and Policy Concerns”. J.KAU: Islamic Econ., Vol 19
Hennink, M., Inge H. & Ajay B. 2011. Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage.
Heron, John. 1999. The Complete Facilitator’s Handbook. London: Kogan Page.
Hobley, M., 1996. Participatory Forestry : The Process of Change in India and Nepal. Rural Development Forestry Study Guide 3. London
Ibrahim, N. 2003. Pelan Tindakan Desa. Skudai: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Li, Tania Murray. 2000. Locating indigenous environmental knowledge in Indonesia. In Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and Its Transformations : Critical Anthropological Perspectives. Edited by R. Ellen, P. Parkes, and E. Bicker Amsterdam : Harwood Academic Publishers, pp. 1212-149.
Maarif, M. S. 2003. Teknik-Teknik Kuantitatif untuk Manajemen. Jakarta: Grasindo
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. New York: SAGE Publications.
Mohammad, Tahir Sabit Haji. 2010. “Principles of Sustainable Development in Ibn Khaldun’s Economic Thought”. Malaysian Journal of Real Estate, Vol 5, No.1.
Muhi, Ali Hanapiah. 2011. Fenomena Pembangunan Desa. Jawa Barat: Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Nazir. 1998. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
Newman, William Lawrence, 1999. Social Research Methods, London: Needham Heights, Allyn and Bacon.
Ngah, I. (2009), Rural Development in Malaysia, Chapter 2 in Ishak Yusof ed. Malaysia’s Economy, Past, Present and Future: Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Strategic Research Centre.
Ngah, I., Preston, D. and Nor Azman Abdul Rahman (2010), Current Planning Priorities In Rural Villages In Malaysia, Learning From the New Malaysian Village Action Plan, ISDA Conference, Montpellier France, 28-31 June 2010
Nugroho, Agus Eko. 2002. Pola Pembangunan Sosial Ekonomi Daerah. Jakarta: LIPI Press.
Parker, I. 1994. Discourse Analysis. Dalam P. Banister, E. Burman, I. Parker, M. Taylor, dan C. Tindall (Eds), Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide (hlm. 92-107). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sedarmayanti, 2004. Good Governance (Kepemerintahan Yang Baik). Bandung: Mandar Maju
Sjafrizal. 2009. Teknik Praktis Penyusunan Rencana Pembangunan Daerah. Jakarta: Baduose Media.
Soebroto. 1988. Pembangunan Desa, Mulai dari Belakang. Terjemahan. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Soetrisno, Lukman. 1995. Upaya Menciptakan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan
Spradley, Jb. 1980. Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winstons.
Strauss, Anselm & Juliet Corbin. 2003. Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sumodiningrat, Gunawan. 1997. Pembangunan Daerah dan Pemberdayaan. Masyarakat, Jakarta: PT. Bina
Sumpeno, Wahjudin. 2011. Perencanaan Desa Terpadu. Banda Aceh: Read Press
Sunario, dan Susanto, Astrid. 1997. Kebudayaan Jayawijaya dalam Pembangunan Bangsa. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Suzetta, P. 2007. Perencanaan Pembangunan Indonesia. Menteri Negara Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Kepala BAPPENAS. www.bappenas.go.id. (pdf) Di akses, 14 Desember 2013.
Tjokroamidjojo, Bintoro. 1990. Perencanaan Pembangunan. Jakarta: Haji Masagung.
Tjokro Winoto, Moeljarto. 1987. Politik Pembangunan Sebuah Analisis Konsep, Arah dan Strategi. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Tyson, Shaun dan Tony Jackson, 2011, Perilaku Organisasi, Yogyakarta: ANDI. Yin, Robert K. 2000, Studi Kasus (Desain dan Metode). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persad

Published

2021-10-09

How to Cite

RAHARJO, A. P., & KURNIASARI, N. (2021). STUDI KOMPARATIF TAHAPAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN PERDESAAN DI INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA: Studi Kasus: Desa Alamendah, Kabupaten Bandung-Indonesia dan Desa Peruas, Pahang-Malaysia. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah Dan Kota, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.29313/jpwk.v14i2.278

Issue

Section

Articles