Peer Review Process

Any submitted paper will be reviewed by reviewers. The review process employs Double-blind Review that the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author does not know the identity of the reviewers. All submitted papers are put through the double-blind review process. The journal accepts both research articles and theoretical study articles, which will be peer-reviewed by at least 2 (two) reviewers. The peer review process in academic journals is a critical component to ensure the quality and credibility of published research. Here's a detailed overview of the typical peer review process:

1. Submission: Authors submit their research manuscripts to academic journals relevant to their field of study. The submission package usually includes the manuscript, an abstract, author information, and sometimes supplementary materials.

2. Editorial Assessment: Upon submission, the journal editor conducts an initial assessment to ensure that the manuscript meets the journal's scope, guidelines, and standards. If the submission passes this initial check, it proceeds to the next stage.

3. Assignment of Reviewers: The editor selects appropriate peer reviewers, often experts in the same field as the manuscript, to evaluate the paper. Reviewers are chosen based on their expertise, qualifications, and absence of conflicts of interest.

4. Peer Review: Reviewers assess the manuscript's quality, originality, methodology, significance, and adherence to academic standards. They provide constructive feedback, comments, and recommendations to improve the manuscript. Reviewers may recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection of the paper.

5. Author Revision: Based on the reviewers' comments, authors revise their manuscript to address any concerns, improve clarity, correct errors, and strengthen arguments. Authors may also provide rebuttals or explanations for reviewer comments.

6. Editorial Decision: After receiving the revised manuscript, the editor evaluates it along with the reviewers' comments. The editor makes a final decision on whether to accept, reject, or request further revisions to the manuscript. This decision considers the reviewers' recommendations, originality, significance, and overall quality.

7. Notification to Authors: Authors are informed of the editorial decision, along with any additional feedback or instructions from the editor and reviewers.

8. Publication: If accepted, the manuscript undergoes final editing and formatting before publication in the journal. The published paper becomes part of the scholarly record and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field.

9. Post-Publication Review: After publication, the paper is subject to scrutiny and discussion by the academic community. Peers may provide additional feedback, criticisms, or insights through comments, citations, or subsequent research.

Overall, the peer review process ensures the integrity, credibility, and quality of academic publications by subjecting them to rigorous evaluation by independent experts in the field. It helps validate research findings, identify strengths and weaknesses, and facilitate scholarly discourse and advancement.