“Aku bisa ga ya?”: Persepsi Pernikahan Korban Perselingkuhan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29313/schema.v9i02.5350Keywords:
Perselingkuhan, Persepsi Pernikahan, Relasi RomantisAbstract
Kasus perselingkuhan di Indonesia telah meningkat dalam beberapa dekade terakhir, dengan Indonesia menduduki peringkat kedua di Asia dalam jumlah kasus perselingkuhan pada tahun 2023. Kasus perselingkuhan berdampak signifikan bagi para korban, terutama dalam hal membangun kepercayaan dan keterikatan serta memengaruhi hubungan mereka di masa depan. Meskipun demikan, riset yang menyoroti persepsi korban perselingkuhan yang belum menikah terhadap pernikahan di masa depan masih terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengekplorasi persepsi pernikahan pada individu yang menjadi korban perselingkuhan dalam relasi romantis. Dengan melibatkan 115 partisipan, studi ini menggunakan survei online kualitatif melalui pertanyaan terbuka pada google form. Data dianalisis dengan analisis tematik menggunakan aplikasi MAXQDA 2020. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pernikahan bagi korban perselingkuhan adalah harapan pernikahan, ketidakamanan emosional, pentingnya kesiapan pernikahan, ancaman permasalahan, keengganan menikah, menjalankan ibadah.
References
Arnett, J. J., Žukauskienė, R., & Sugimura, K. (2014). The new life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18–29 years: Implications for mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(7), 569-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(14)00080-7
Fincham, F. D., & Cui, M. (2011). Romantic Relationship in Emerging Adulthood. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761935
Santika, R., & Permana, M. Z. (2021). Eksplorasi alasan seseorang berpacaran pada emerging adulthood. Jurnal Psikologi Perseptual, 6(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.24176/perseptual.v6i2.6042
Johnson, D. J. & Rusbult, C. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partner as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of personality and social Psychology, 57, 967-980. . https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.967
Drigotas, S. M., Safstrom, C. A., & Gentilia, T. (1999). An investment model prediction of dating infidelity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(3), 509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.509
Blow, A. J., & Hartnett, K. (2005). Infidelity in committed relationships I: A methodological review. Journal of marital and family therapy, 31(2), 183-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01555.x
Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., & Verette, J. (1994). The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena.
Winslow, C. (2024). 7 Long-Term Psychological Effects of Infidelity & How to Cope. Marriage.com.
Simanjuntak, J. (2023). Survei: Indonesia Negara Kedua di Asia Terbanyak Kasus Perselingkuhan, Malaysia Paling Setia. Tribunnews.
Annur, C.M. (2024). Angka Pernikahan Turun pada 2023, Rekor Terendah Sedekade Terakhir.Databoks.
Situmorang, A. (2007). Staying single in a married world. Asian Population Studies, 3, 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730701746433
Rumundor, P. C. B. (2020). Apa arti konsep “Pernikahan” bagi orang Indonesia?. Binus University. https://psychology.binus.ac.id/2020/09/18/apa-arti-konsep-pernikahan-bagi-orang-indonesia/
Permana, M. Z., & Medynna, A. D. N. (2021). Ribet!: Persepsi Menikah pada Emerging Adulthood. Psikostudia: Jurnal Psikologi, 10(3), 248-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/psikostudia.v10i3.5509
Aulia, M. R., Rifayanti, R., & Putri, E. T. (2021). Persepsi Pernikahan Menurut Wanita Dewasa Awal yang Orang Tuanya Bercerai. Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 9(2), 286-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.30872/psikoborneo.v9i2.5970
Lybertha, D. P., & Desiningrum, D. R. (2016). Kematangan emosi dan persepsi terhadap pernikahan pada dewasa awal: studi korelasi pada mahasiswa fakultas hukum Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Empati, 5(1), 148-152. https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2016.15094
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.2.1450
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Granello, D. H., & Wheaton, J. E. (2004). Online data collection: Strategies for research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82(4), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00325.x
Spall, S. (1998). Peer debriefing in qualitative research: Emerging operational models. Qualitative inquiry, 4(2), 280-292. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049800400208
Carroll, J. S., Willoughby, B., Badger, S., Nelson, L. J., Barry, C. M., & Madsen, S. D. (2007). So close, yet so far away: The impact of varying marital horizons on emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 219-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558407299697
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological review, 93(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119
Nurhayati, S. R., Faturochman, F., & Helmi, A. F. (2019). Marital quality: A conceptual review. Buletin Psikologi, 27(2), 109-124. 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.37691
Larson, J. H., & Thayne, T. R. (1999). Marital attitudes and personal readiness for marriage of young adult children of alcoholics. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 16(4), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1300/J020v16n04_06
Aini, H., & Afdal, A. (2020). Analisis kesiapan psikologis pasangan dalam menghadapi pernikahan. Jurnal Aplikasi IPTEK Indonesia, 4(2), 136-146. 10.24036/4.24372
Olshon, D. H., & DeFrain, J., & Skogrand, L. (2019). Marriage and Families: Intimacy, Diversity, and Strenghs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Wenry Ainasya Salsabila, Yunita Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.