The Role of Village Government in Achieving Village Without Poverty

Authors

  • Ni Kadek Sinarwati Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Komang Eka Putra Sekolah Tinggi Sosial Politik Wira Bakti
  • I Wayan Rona Diatmika School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v39i2.2081

Keywords:

Poverty, Village, BUMDes

Abstract

This  study aims to describe the  achievements, roles of village governments, supporting factors, obstacles and work plans of the village government to accelerate the achievement of villages without poverty in  Antiga Kelod Village.  This type of  research was qualitative descriptive,  with primary and secondary data. The method of data collection were observation, documentation and in-depth interviews.  Research informants were village government, poor people, local assistants  and BUMDEs managers.  The results showed that the achievement of villages without poverty was 70.45 percent, in the good category. The role of the village government was carried out by intensifying the village's cash-intensive program, the partitioning of villagers' and food security programs. Supporting the achievement were the existence of BUMDes, livestock farmer groups, village funds and social capital. The obstacle  to achievement was villagers who were reluctant to be excluded from the data of the poor.  The village government's work plan to accelerate the achievement of a village without poverty is to develop the village's tourism potential. The village government was advised to take a persuasive approach to villagers who were reluctant to be excluded from the data of the poor.

References

Ali, I. I., Sutarna, I. T., Abdullah, I., Kamaluddin, K., & Mas’ad, M. (2019). Faktor Penghambat Dan Pendukung Badan Usaha Milik Desa Pada Kawasan Pertambangan Emas Di Sumbawa Barat. Sosiohumaniora, 21(3), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v21i3.23464

Amini, R., Nahdlatul, U., & Mataram, W. (2015). Analisis Pengaruh Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Proyek Pembangunan Masyarakat Pesisir ( Ccdp – Ifad ) Terhadap Kemiskinan Di Kabupaten Lombok Barat. 9(1), 1–8.

Anggraeni, M. R. R. S. (2016). PERANAN BADAN USAHA MILIK DESA (BUMDES) PADA KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT PEDESAAN STUDI PADA BUMDES GUNUNG KIDUL YOGYAKARTA. MODUS, 28(2), 1–14.

Arsjad, F., Hunawa, R., Sahi, N. A., Nuna, M., & Gorontalo, U. (2022). Economics and Digital Business Review Peranan Pemerintah Desa dalam Penanggulangan Kemiskinan di Desa Buntulia Jaya Kecamatan Duhiyadaa. 3(2), 379–396.

Astriani, E. (2019). Pelaksanaan Odf (Open Defecation Free) Di Desa Besuki Kecamatan Munjungan Kabupaten Trenggalek. Publiciana, 24–39. https://journal.unita.ac.id/index.php/publiciana/article/download/195/182

Daraba, H. D. (2017). Kata kunci: program, dana desa, tingkat partisipasi, masyarakat. 19(1), 52–58.

Diana, M. (2021). Social Capital Analysis at The Citarum Harum Implementation Area. MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 37(2), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v37i2.7823

Herdiyana, SE., MM., M.Acc. Fin., D. (2020). Pengaruh Padat Karya Tunai Terhadap Tingkat Kemiskinan di Pedesaan Prov. Jawa Barat dan Riau. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Industri, 20(3), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.35137/jei.v20i3.360

Hoe, K. C., Abd Wahab, H., Bakar, S. H. A., & Islam, M. R. (2018). Community participation for rural poverty alleviation: A case of the Iban community in Malaysia. International Social Work, 61(4), 518–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872816673890

Indikator SDG’s dan Kewenanannya. (n.d.).

Jenderal, K. D., Desa, P., Perdesaan, D. A. N., Keempat, P., Keputusan, A., Jenderal, D., Dan, P., Masyarakat, P., & Desa, K. (2021). Nomor 398.4.1 tahun 2021.

Julioe, R. (2017). No TitleÉ?______. Ekp, 13(3), 1576–1580.

Kafabih, A. (2018). Analisis Peran Modal Sosial Badan Usaha Milik Desa. Oeconomicus Journal Of Economics, 5(1), 60–77.

Kemendes PDTT. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi No. 13 Tahun 2020 tentang Prioritas Penggunaan Dana Desa Tahun 2021. Peraturan Menteri,Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, Dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia, 1, 1–32. https://sdgsdesa.kemendesa.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Peraturan-Menteri-Desa-Pembangunan-Daerah-Tertinggal-dan-Transmigrasi-Nomor-13-Tahun-2020-tentang-Prioritas-Penggunaan-Dana-Desa-2021-Salinan.pdf

Ketahanan Pangan, T., Kemiskinan, D., Darwis, V., Dan, S., Wayan, I., Pusat, R., Ekonomi, S., & Pertanian, K. (2013). DAMPAK PROGRAM DESA MANDIRI PANGAN The Impact of Rural Food Self-Sufficiency Program on Food Security and Poverty Status. 47–58.

Mimin Sundari Nasution, Zulkarnaini, & Mayarni. (2021). Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora ISSN 1411 - 0903 : eISSN: 2443-2660. Sosiohumaniora: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 23(2), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v24i3.35845

Murdiansyah, I. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pengentasan Kemiskinan Berbasis Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Studi Kasus pada Program Gerdu-Taskin di Kabupaten Malang). Jurnal Widya Gama Lumajang, 4(1), 71–92.

Ni Kadek Sinarwati, A. M. (2019). The Role of Village Own Enterprises to Rural Development. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law. The Role of Village Own Enterprises to Rural Development. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 18(5), 77–83. https://seajbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/seajbel5-VOL18_227.pdf

Nindatu, P. I. (2019). Komunikasi Pembangunan Melalui Pemberdayaan Masyarakat untuk Pengentasan kemiskinan. Jurnal Persekptif Komunikatif, 3(2), 91–103.

Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. (2004). Metode Penelitian Bisnis (S. P. Apri Nuryanto (Ed.); 7th ed.).

RESNAWATY, R. (2019). Kontribusi Dunia Usaha dalam Pelaksanaan Program Pelestarian Fungsi Sungai (Studi Kasus Pelaksanaan CSR Perusahaan Listrik dalam program Citarum Harum). Sosiohumaniora, 21(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v21i3.20206

Safe’i, R., Febryano, I. G., & Aminah, L. N. (2018). Effect of the existence gapoktan to farmer income and land cover change in community forest. Sosiohumaniora - Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 20(2), 109–114.

Setiawan, A. (2019). Analisis perbedaan tingkat kemiskinan dan ketimpangan perdesaan sebelum dan sesudah digulirkannya dana desa Analysis of differences in poverty levels and rural inequality before and after the village funds are revolved. Akuntabel, 16(1), 31–35.

Sinarwati, N. K., Marhaeni, A., Made Utama, S. I., & Budi, S. (2020). Does Entrepreneurship Supply Chain Management Mediate the Effect of VOE Resources and Social Capital to Performance of Craftsmen? In Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt (Vol. 9, Issue 5). http://excelingtech.co.uk/

Sinarwati, N. K., & Prayudi, M. A. (2021). Kinerja Badan Usaha Milik Desa Dan Kontribusinya Bagi Pendapatan Asli Desa. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(3), 505. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v10i3.37931

Suartini, S. (2021). A Study of The Linking Local Expenditure Quality to Reducing Poverty Rate in Bengkulu Province. MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 37(1), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v37i1.6364

Sulila, I. (2020). Village Fund Policy Implementation Model in Efforts to Reduce Poverty Rate. MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 36(2), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v36i2.6358

Swandari, N. K. A. S., Setiawina, N. D., & Marhaeni, A. A. I. N. (2017). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penentu Kinerja Karyawan BUMDes di Kabupaten Jembrana. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 4(VOLUME.06.NO.04.TAHUN 2017), 1365–1394.

Taufik, M. (2020). PRIORITAS PENGGUNAAN DANA DESA TAHUN 2021 DAN UPAYA REVITALISASI BUMDES (p. 55). KEMENTERIAN DESA, PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH TERTINGGAL DAN TRANSMIGRASI.

Ulandari, S. (2022). 1,2,3,4. 3, 872–879.

Wahyudi, T., Damayanti, E., & Abadi, S. (2019). STRATEGI PENURUNAN TINGKAT KEMISKINAN MASYARAKAT PEDESAAN BERBASIS PENGUATAN MODAL SOSIAL DAN KESEJAHTERAAN MASYARAKAT MENGGUNAKAN METODE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) (Studi Kasus Pada Kabupaten Pringsewu Provinsi Lampung). PProceeding SINTAK 2019, 3(1), 343–351. https://unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/sintak/article/view/7612

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30