Makna Diri Jurnalis dalam Peliputan Bencana yang Membahayakan Keselamatan Jiwa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29313/jrjmd.v4i2.5334Keywords:
Jurnalis, Bencana, Makna DiriAbstract
Abstrak. Dalam situasi bencana, jurnalis dianggap mempertaruhkan keselamatannya karena harus melakukan peliputan di zone berbahaya. Penelitian ini mencoba memandang jurnalisme kebencanaan dalam perspektif jurnalis yang memaknai profesionalitasnya ketika melakukan peliputan bencana yang membahayakan keselamatannya. Maka penelitian ini melakukan pendekatan fenomenologis pada jurnalis yang memaknai diri dan profesinya ketika situasi bencana. Pengumpulan data primer dilakukan dengan melakukan wawancara kepada 30 jurnalis dan juga FGD kepada beberapa jurnalis sebagai informan yang memiliki pengalaman pernah melakukan peliputan di lokasi bencana. Penelitian melakukan analisis dengan mencoba menemukan pemaknaan jurnalis dalam meliput bencana secara holistik. Melalui analisis fenomenologis interpretatif (IPA), penelitian mencoba mengeksplorasi bagaimana jurnalis memahami profesinya ketika bencana. Hasil penelitian menghasilkan kategorisasi motif, pengalaman, dan makna jurnalis. Informan mengemukakan sejumlah motif, yakni advokasi dan profesionalitas. Kemudian adanya pengalaman keterancaman pada jurnalis. Pemaknaan diri jurnalis terhadap profesinya perlu didukung oleh regulasi yang dapat menjamin keselamatan jurnalis ketika peliputan di daerah bencana.
Abstract. In a disaster situation, journalists are considered to be risking their safety because they have to cover in a dangerous zone. This study tries to view journalism in a disaster situation from the perspective of journalists who interpret their professionalism when covering a disaster that endangers their safety. Therefore, this study uses a phenomenological approach to journalists who interpret themselves and their profession during a disaster situation. Primary data collection was conducted by interviewing 30 journalists and also FGDs with several journalists as informants who have experience covering disaster locations. The study conducted an analysis by trying to find the meaning of journalists in covering disasters holistically. Through interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA), the study tried to explore how journalists understand their profession during a disaster. The results of the study produced a categorization of motives, experiences, and meanings of journalists. Informants put forward a number of motives, namely advocacy and professionalism. Then there is the experience of being threatened by journalists. The meaning of journalists' self-interpretation of their profession needs to be supported by regulations that can guarantee the safety of journalists when covering disaster areas
References
Antunes, M. N., da Silva Pereira, S., Zêzere, J. L., & Oliveira, A. E. (2022). Disaster Journalism in Print Media: Analysis of the Top 10 Hydrogeomorphological Disaster Events in Portugal, 1865–2015. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 13(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-022-00425-2
Ariestyani, K. (2023). Constructive Journalism: Indonesian Journalists’ Perception and Implementation in the Covid-19 News. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jkmi.v12i1.1058
Arifianto, R., Arti, R., Sari, W., & Dewi, R. (2023). MARKET DRIVEN JOURNALISM PRACTICES IN DISASTER NEWS CONNECTED WITH MYTHS IN ONLINE MEDIA. 2023, 127–139.
Bunce, M., Scott, M., & Wright, K. (2019). Humanitarian Journalism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.821
Buoncompagni, G. (2024). Media and Natural Disasters: Organising Storytelling in the Age of Climate Change. Journalism and Media, 5(2), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5020041
Charles, M. (2011). News, Documentary and Advocacy Journalism . 2004. http://microsites.bournemouth.ac.uk/cjcr/files/2013/10/JNC-2013-Chapter-23-Charles-v1-02.pdf
Chen, B., & Koo, G. H. (2022). Journalistic Roles and News Framing: A Comparative Framing Analysis of COVID-19 Pandemic Across China, South Korea, and the United States. International Journal of Communication, 16, 4254–4274.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore.
Djamba, Y. K., & Neuman, W. L. (2002). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. In Teaching Sociology (Vol. 30, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488
Englund, L., Bergh Johannesson, K., & Arnberg, F. K. (2023). Reporting under extreme conditions: journalists’ experience of disaster coverage. Frontiers in Communication, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1060169
Farías, D., Reyna, V. H., & Rocha-Montelongo, F. (2024). Between objectivity and emotionality: Proyecto Puente’s disaster journalism. Brazilian Journalism Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v20n1.2024.1621
Geiß, S. (2022). The Agenda-Setting-Effects of News Factor Exposure : A Field Study Comparing the Transmission Paths and Impact of Issue Exposure and News Factor Exposure. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221091259
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Firmansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.