https://aboutmusicschools.com https://slotmgc.com https://300thcombatengineersinwwii.com https://mobilephonesource.co.uk https://discord-servers.io https://esmark.net https://slotmgc.com https://nikeshoesinc.us https://ellisislandimmigrants.org https://holidaysanthology.com https://southaventownecenter.net https://jimgodfreydesign.com https://mckinneypaintingpros.com https://enchantedmansion.org https://mckinneypaintingpros.com https://laurabrodieauthor.com https://holidaysanthology.com https://ardictionary.com https://113.30.151.116 https://103.252.118.20 https://206.189.83.174 https://157.230.39.109 https://128.199.85.208 https://172.104.51.149 https://174.138.21.250 https://157.245.50.183 https://152.42.239.189 https://188.166.210.125 https://152.42.178.155 https://192.53.172.202 https://172.104.188.91 https://103.252.118.157 https://63.250.61.107 https://165.22.104.74

Distribusi Afeksi sebagai Bentuk Aktivasi Hak Suara dalam Ruang Digital Learning

Authors

  • Dalatina Peloggia Gustianingsih Jurnalistik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29313/jrjmd.v3i1.2235

Keywords:

Negosiasi, distribusi afeksi, kesadaran

Abstract

Abstract.The phenomenon of Covid-19 in Indonesia raises the pros and cons of digital learning which is increasingly widespread. These include a comparison of offline and online learning in elementary and secondary school, the readiness of resources and technology infrastructure, to the question of how the affection distribution process in digital learning works. The purpose of this study was to compare the distribution of affection in online or digital learning in dance extracurriculars in non-formal (community-based) and formal schools. The practice of both is a turning point in the process of critical awareness and understanding which shows that the distribution of affection is and can continue to roll in digital learning. Based on data in the form of experience as a facilitator in non-formal and formal online extracurricular activities, the research method used in this study is Participation Action Research (PAR). The results of the research that has been carried out are: (1) spontaneous and active negotiation also activation of voice rights on all matters related to the learning process, through one of the digital conference platforms; (2) critical understanding that the issue of education is no longer limited to the problem of model/methods used; (3) awareness of learning standards or achievements, by reading and interpreting them not only vertically.

Abstrak. Fenomena Covid-19 di Indonesia memunculkan pro dan kontra atas digital learning yang semakin marak. Di antaranya: perbandingan pembelajaran luring dan daring pada sekolah dasar dan menengah, kesiapan sumber daya dan infrastruktur teknologi, hingga pertanyaan mengenai bagaimana proses distribusi afeksi dalam digital learning berjalan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memperbandingkan distribusi afeksi dalam pembelajaran daring atau digital learning ekskul tari di sekolah nonformal (berbasis komunitas) dan formal. Praktik keduanya menjadi titik balik proses penyadaran dan pemahaman kritis yang menunjukkan bahwa distribusi afeksi masih dan bisa terus bergulir dalam digital learning. Berdasar data yang berupa pengalaman menjadi fasilitator dalam ekskul daring sekolah nonformal (berbasis komunitas) dan formal, maka metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah participation action research (PAR). Hasil dari riset yang telah dilakukan adalah: (1) adanya negosiasi dan aktivasi hak suara secara spontan dan aktif atas segala hal yang berkaitan dengan proses pembelajaran, melalui salah satu platform digital conference; (2) pemahaman kritis bahwa isu pendidikan tidak lagi sebatas persoalan model/metode yang digunakan; dan (3) penyadaran akan standar atau capaian pembelajaran, dengan cara membaca dan menafsirkannya tidak hanya secara vertikal.

References

Berson, Michael J., and Peter Balyta. 2004. “Technological Thinking and Practice in the Social Studies: Transcending the Tumultuous Adolescence of Reform.” ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) 20(4):141–50.

Dewantara, Ki Hadjar. 2013. Ki Hadjar Dewantara Pemikiran, Konsepsi, Keteladanan, Sikap Merdeka. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa (UST-Press).

Diener, Ed., Richard E. Lucas, and Shigero. Oishi. 2003. “Personality, Culture, and Subjective Well Being: Emotional and Cognitive Evaluation of Life.” Annua Reviews 54:403–26.

Gani, Rita, and Ratri R. Astuti, Santi Indra Kusumalestari. 2020. Virtual Public Speaking. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Hidayat, Rakhmat. 2013. Pedagogi Kritis: Sejarah, Perkembangan Dan Pemikiran. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Nadya Kinasih Alkautsar, and Dian Widya Putri. 2022. “Pengaruh Terpaan Media Terhadap Kesadaran Mahasiswa Tentang Protokol Kesehatan Covid-19 3M (Memakai Masker, Mencuci Tangan, Menjaga Jarak).” Jurnal Riset Jurnalistik Dan Media Digital 1(2):135–42. doi: 10.29313/jrjmd.v1i2.505.

Postman, Neil. 1995. The End of Education (Redefining the Value of School). New York: Vintage Books.

Purwanto. 2005. “Tujuan Pendidikan Dan Hasil Belajar: Domain Dan Taksonomi Yang Diunggah Dalam Jurnal Teknologi Dan Pendidikan.” Jurnal Teknologi Dan Pendidikan 09(16).

Rafiud Ilmudinulloh. 2022. “Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa.” Jurnal Riset Jurnalistik Dan Media Digital 121–28. doi: 10.29313/jrjmd.v2i2.1366.

Sandang, Yesaya. 2013. Dari Filsafat Ke Filsafat Teknologi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Sugiyono, P. D. 2017. Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Whyte, William Foote. 1991. Participatory Action Research. London: Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-15